Friday, June 09, 2006

A sick response to Al-Zarqawi's death. (Further thought on earlier post)

I am glad we got the guy. He was dangerous, and he is no longer so. It
is an unfortunate necessity that we kill men in war.

However, I am appalled at some of the responses I have heard on talk Radio.

Rush Limbaugh said he hoped Zarqawi suffered and begged for help. He
said he hoped he felt immense pain, and that the U.S. Army would drag
its feet in getting him medical help.

Glenn Beck joked about handing out cake in celebration.

Yes, I consider myself a Conservative, and for the most part enjoy these
shows. However I am foremost a Christian, and I am saddened by the fact
that this man is most likely in Hell. We are celebrating a wasted life?

Beck especially. While I do not consider him an orthodox Christian (he
is Mormon) he claims the name of Christ.

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Al-Zarquawi dead.

Last night, or early this morning, the army killed Al-Zarqawi. I support
his killing as a matter of security. We needed to kill him. But I mourn
as this man is probably in hell right now.

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Sorry about the funny looking posts.

I post via Email, and when I attempt to put something in a "quote"
notation, it does not quite Translate well from the email.

I will find a better way to indicate quotations.

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Disruption at a Catholic mass.

>
>
> More than 50 gay rights activists wearing rainbow-colored sashes were
> denied Holy Communion at a Pentecost service yesterday at the Roman
> Catholic Cathedral in St. Paul, Minn., parishioners and church
> officials said.
>

Oh great, here we go......
>
> In an act that some witnesses called a "sacrilege" and others called a
> sign of "solidarity," a man who was not wearing a sash received a
> Communion wafer from a priest, broke it into pieces and handed it to
> some of the sash wearers, who consumed it on the spot.
>
I can find no appropriate words to express my rage.

Let's just say Sacrilege is a soft word for what happened.
>
> Ushers threatened to call the police, and a church employee burst into
> tears when the unidentified man re-distributed the consecrated wafer,
> which Catholics consider the body of Christ. But the Mass was not
> interrupted, and the incident ended peacefully, said Dennis McGrath, a
> spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.
>
Violence had already been done by this point.

> "It was confrontational, but we decided not to try to arrest the guy,"
> he said.
> The dramatic episode capped several years of increasing acrimony over
> the Rainbow Sash Movement, an effort by gay Catholics to counter what
> they view as homophobia in the church.
>
The Roman Catholic Church was standing up for the orthodox and
traditional Christian doctrine.

> Beginning in 1997 in England, some Catholics have worn the sashes over
> their left shoulder to Mass each year on Pentecost, the day on which
> the New Testament says the Holy Spirit descended on Jesus's disciples.
> Because the holiday is a celebration of God's gifts, "we think it is
> an appropriate time to celebrate the gift of our sexuality," said
> Brian McNeill, a rainbow-sash organizer in Minneapolis.
>
The gift of sex has been perverted.
>
> For a few years, sash-wearers were allowed to receive Communion in
> some U.S. cities, including Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Los
> Angeles, Minneapolis-St. Paul and Rochester, N.Y. But since 2004, most
> U.S. bishops have cracked down on the movement.
>
> Last year, Cardinal Francis Arinze, head of the Vatican department in
> charge of worship, wrote a letter to Archbishop Harry J. Flynn of St.
> Paul, stating that the rainbow sash is a sign of protest against the
> church's teachings on sexuality and that the Mass is not an
> appropriate forum for protests.
>
HalleluJah!
>
> The movement's leaders insist that wearing the sash is not an act of
> protest.
>
Let me wear a leather jacket to a PETA meeting and lets see if it is
taken as a protest.

> "When Archbishop Flynn and Cardinal Arinze say it's a protest, I say,
> 'But you guys aren't the ones wearing it -- we are, and we see it as a
> celebration,' " McNeill said. "The premise of the sash is that gay
> people are part of the Catholic community, part of the people of God.
> We are there proudly celebrating Mass."
> The number of those wearing rainbow sashes has never been large, and
> it appears to be declining. The largest single gathering was last year
> in St. Paul, where about 125 people were turned away from Communion.
> In most cities, there have been only a few wearing sashes.
>
> None were reported yesterday in the Archdiocese of Washington, which
> has a policy of denying Communion to anyone wearing a visible sign of
> protest.
>

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Reading the Da Vinci Code.

_/*WARNING: SPOILERS BELOW

*/_

Sad. The book can be torn down by a 20 minute Google search, yet people
have lost faith over this.

I mean, I like the story. It is a thrilling mystery novel. I like the
characters, I like the plot, and the pacing gets your heart beating. I
am about 3/4th of the way through it and I can't wait to see how they
get out away from the French Police. I would also like to see what those
letters in Sophie's drawer have to say.

But the supposed history is just plain stupid.

A prime example would be the assertion that the Dead Sea Scrolls and the
Nag Hammadi documents were the earliest Christian Documents. This is
ridiculous as the Gnostic Gospels are Significantly younger than the
Canonical Gospels, and The Dead Sea Scrolls were buried by a Jewish
Sect, and only contained Old Testament Works.

The Canonical Gospels were all written before 100 A. D. Wheras the
Gnostic Gospels are much younger.

Also, the picture the Gnostics paint of Christ are fantastic. The book
claims that orthodox Christianity downplays Christ's Humanity. However
it is the Gnostic Gospels which portray him as a non-physical spirit. I
also don't remember the canonical orthodox Gospels mentioning a Talking
Cross.

/*
> (38) Then, seeing this, these soldiers woke up the centurions and
> elders, for they themselves were all there to keep watch. (39) And
> while they were describing what they had seen, again they saw three
> men coming out from the tomb, two supporting the other and a cross
> following them. (40) The heads of the two reached up to the heavens
> and the head of the one they were leading by the hand went beyond the
> heavens. (41) And they heard a voice from heaven saying, "Did you
> preach to those who sleep?"
> (42) Obediently, there was heard from the cross, "Yes."
*/

Another contradiction to the theme of the "Sacred Feminine being
destroyed by the Church" is this little ditty from the "Gospel" of Thomas.

/*
> /*For every woman who makes herself male will enter into the kingdom
> of heaven. - Thomas 114*/

*/
Wow.